SSX® Systemic Decision Integrity Review

Check whether your “solutions” were
permanent cures or elegant temporary fixes.

SSX® Systemic Decision Integrity Review is a focused, case-based review of past investigations, studies, and major decisions. Using the STA® stack, it asks a simple but uncomfortable question: did we truly solve the systemic problem, or did we only rearrange the symptoms?

The review does not blame individuals.
It reads the thinking patterns, investigation paths, and systemic blind spots that produced the final decision, mapped to SMS® and documented through an SMR®-style narrative.

Typical scope: 8–10 hours of deep review per case · Executive and governance level · Integrated with STT®, SMS®, SMR®, and SEM®.

From documents and reports to systemic thinking patterns.

The review uses SSX® and the STA® architecture to read how the case was approached, long before the final recommendation:

Problem framing: How the issue was defined, which stakeholders and boundaries were included or excluded.
Investigation path: Which data, processes, and structures were examined, and which were ignored.
Systemic leverage: Whether interventions targeted events, processes, incentives, structure, or purpose.
Time horizon: How far into second- and third-order effects the decision logic actually looked.

The outcome is not a “pass/fail” verdict, but a structured systemic analysis that reveals how decision integrity can be upgraded for future cases.

What you receive from an SSX® review.

Each review concludes with a concise, board-ready narrative that is fully integrated with the STA® stack:

STT® insight: A read of the dominant thinking patterns demonstrated in the case.
SMS® positioning: Where the organization’s practice in this case sits on the Systemic Maturity Scale.
SMR®-style summary: A short Systemic Maturity Report describing strengths, gaps, and systemic contradictions.
SEM® execution levers: Practical levers to upgrade how similar cases are handled in the future.
STT® → SMS® → SMR® → SEM® integration Systemic decision governance

When “we did everything right” still produced weak results.

Organizations typically commission an SSX® review when:

Leadership feels that “all procedures were followed” yet the outcome remains disappointing or fragile.
The same pattern of failure appears across different departments, projects, or years.
Boards or audit committees want to understand systemic causes without entering personal blame dynamics.

The review becomes a learning asset for governance, risk, and transformation teams, raising systemic maturity (SMS®) rather than adding another isolated “lesson learned” document.